Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad. Pakistan.

10.22044/rera.2026.17534.1520

Abstract

Wind energy constitutes a vital pillar of global decarbonisation strategy, with horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) accounting for over 95% of installed capacity. This study addresses site-specific aerodynamic design and optimization of a 25-metre HAWT rotor blade tailored to the Jamshoro wind corridor, Pakistan, employing Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory within the QBlade v0.96 computational platform. Eight NACA 4-digit airfoils—symmetric 00xx series (0012, 0015, 0018, 0020) and cambered 55xx series (5512, 5515, 5518, 5520)—were systematically evaluated across Reynolds numbers from 4.0×10⁵ to 1.2×10⁶. Four distinct blade configurations were developed and benchmarked under Jamshoro site conditions (mean wind speed 9 m/s; operational range 5–14 m/s; rated rotational speed 25 RPM). The fully cambered 55xx blade achieved a maximum power coefficient Cₙ = 0.52 at tip-speed ratio TSR = 9, representing 88% of the theoretical Betz limit, generating 500 kW at mean conditions and 1,373 kW at 14 m/s. Symmetric designs were outperformed by 37%. A hybrid root–cambered tip configuration achieved 96% of peak performance. Parametric chord and twist studies confirm manufacturing tolerance of ±20% with less than 5% power variation, validating feasibility for emerging-market production. Peak aerodynamic loading (normal force 3,423 N; tangential force 45,077 N) occurs at 50–70% span, establishing structural design limits. Results support indigenous wind turbine manufacturing in Pakistan with 20–30% cost reduction, contributing to the national 30% renewable-electricity target by 2030.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1] IPCC, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, (2023).
[2] IEA, World Energy Outlook 2024, International Energy Agency, Paris, France, (2024).
[3] GWEC, Global Wind Report 2024, Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels, Belgium, (2024).
[4] Veers P, Dykes K, Lantz E, Barth S, Bottasso CL, Carlson O, et al. Grand challenges in the design and manufacturing of large wind turbine blades. Wind Energy Science. 2023;8(11):1649–87.
[5] Manwell JF, McGowan JG, Rogers AL. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2023.
[6] Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy. SG 18-236 DD Offshore Wind Turbine—Technical Specifications. Hamburg: SGRE; 2024.
[7] GE Vernova. Haliade-X 18 MW Offshore Wind Turbine Platform. Schenectady, NY: GE Vernova; 2024.
[8] WindEurope. Offshore Wind in Europe: Key Trends and Statistics 2024. Brussels: WindEurope; 2024.
[9] Brøndsted P, Lilholt H, Lystrup A. Composite materials for wind power turbine blades. Annual Review of Materials Research. 2022;52:171–99.
[10] Chen X, Zhao W, Zhao XL, Xu JZ. Preliminary failure investigation of a 52.3 m glass/carbon hybrid composite wind turbine blade. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2023;143:106875.
[11] Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AYC. Digital twin in wind turbine operations and maintenance: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;162:112395.
[12] Stetco A, Dinmohammadi F, Zhao X, Robu V, Flynn D, Barnes M, et al. Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: a review. Renewable Energy. 2023;203:1–28.
[13] Barlas TK, van Kuik GAM, Zahle F. Lifetime extension of wind turbine blades through smart rotor control. Wind Energy Science. 2022;7(4):1567–84.
[14] Navalkar ST, van Wingerden JW, Fleming PA. Load reduction using trailing-edge flaps on a 13 MW wind turbine. Wind Energy. 2023;26(9):881–900.
[15] Burton T, Sharpe D, Jenkins N, Bossanyi E. Wind Energy Handbook. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2021.
[16] Hansen MOL. Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2015.
[17] Glauert H. Airplane Propellers. In: Durand WF, editor. Aerodynamic Theory. Vol. IV. Berlin: Springer; 1935. p. 169–360.
[18] Wilson RE, Lissaman PBS. Applied Aerodynamics of Wind Power Machines. Corvallis: Oregon State University; 1974.
[19] Ingram G. Wind Turbine Blade Analysis Using the Blade Element Momentum Method. Version 1.1. Durham: Durham University; 2011.
[20] Hansen MOL, Sørensen JN, Voutsinas S, Sørensen N, Madsen HA. State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2020;42(4–5):285–330.
[21] Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE. Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications. Chichester: Wiley; 2022.
[22] Timmer WA. An overview of NACA 6-digit airfoil series characteristics with reference to airfoils for large wind turbine blades. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting; 2009 Jan 5–8; Orlando, FL. Reston: AIAA; 2009.
[23] Somers DM. Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil. NREL/SR-440-6918. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 1997.
[24] Jackson KT, Zuteck MD, van Dam CP, Standish KJ, Berry D. Innovative design approaches for large wind turbine blades. Wind Energy. 2005;8(2):141–71.
[25] Grasso F, Cleynen O, Munduate X, Coiro DP. Design and optimization of aeroelastically tailored wind turbine blades. Wind Energy. 2023;26(12):1328–47.
[26] Bortolotti P, Bottasso CL, Croce A, Sartori L. Integration of multiple passive load mitigation technologies by automated design optimization—the case of a medium-size onshore wind turbine. Wind Energy. 2019;22(8):1079–96.
[27] Sessarego M, Ramos-García N, Yang H, Shen W. Design optimization of a large wind turbine blade considering aeroelastic stability. Engineering Structures. 2020;216:110736.
[28] Ning A, Dykes K. Understanding the benefits and limitations of increasing maximum rotor tip speed for utility-scale wind turbines. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2014;524:012087.
[29] Hayat K, Ha SK. Load mitigation of wind turbine blade by aeroelastic tailoring via unbalanced laminates composites. Composite Structures. 2015;128:122–33.
[30] Griffith DT, Ashwill TD. The Sandia 100-meter All-glass Baseline Wind Turbine Blade: SNL100-00. SAND2011-3779. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories; 2011.
[31] Cousins DS, Suzuki Y, Murray RE, Samaniuk JR, Stebner AP. Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;209:1252–63.
[32] Cooperman A, Eberle A, Lantz E. Wind turbine blade material trends and projections. Wind Energy. 2021;24(10):1067–84.
[33] Adnan M, Ahmad J, Ali SF. A comprehensive review on renewable energy projects in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29:63640–61.
[34] Khalid M, Akram U, Shafiq S. Wind power potential and economic analysis of wind energy development in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023;175:113184.
[35] Government of Pakistan. Alternative and Renewable Energy Policy 2019. Islamabad: Ministry of Energy (Power Division); 2019.
[36] Ahmed S, Mahmood M, Hasan A, Siddique GA. Economic viability of wind power in Pakistan. Energy Policy. 2020;142:111458.
[37] Hassan SA, Kalair AR, Abas N, Saleem MS. Pakistan wind energy scenario, issues and way forward. Energy, Ecology and Environment. 2019;4(3):117–28.
[38] Bhutto AW, Bazmi AA, Zahedi G. Greener energy: issues and challenges for Pakistan—wind power prospective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;20:519–38.
[39] Drela M. XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. In: Mueller TJ, editor. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics. Lecture Notes in Engineering, vol 54. Berlin: Springer; 1989. p. 1–12.
[40] Marten D, Wendler J, Pechlivanoglou G, Nayeri CN, Paschereit CO. QBlade: an open source tool for design and simulation of horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2013;3(3):264–9.
[41] Hand MM, Simms DA, Fingersh LJ, Jager DW, Cotrell JR, Schreck S, et al. Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns. NREL/TP-500-29955. Golden, CO: NREL; 2001.